Most "free windshield states" articles collapse three very different legal setups into one list, and several of the biggest ones haven't been updated in years. Here's the actual structure, verified against the primary statutes on August 13, 2026, with the statute linked on every page.
Three states, and only three. Each with a different scope, which is where articles go wrong.
| State | What's covered | The catch |
|---|---|---|
| Florida §627.7288 | Windshield only | Not side or rear glass. Whether calibration cost is included is legally unsettled |
| Kentucky KRS 304.20-060 | All glass, plus required lights, calibration included by statute | The claim must be glass-only. Mixed storm damage voids the waiver |
| South Carolina §38-77-280(B) | All safety glass | Physical-damage coverage is itself optional in SC. A 2026 sunset bill appears to have died; we re-check in 2027 |
Five states where $0 (or reduced) glass coverage exists only if you added it to your policy. The question isn't "what does my state do," it's "what did I buy?"
| State | The option | Worth knowing |
|---|---|---|
| Arizona §20-264 | $0 on glass and required lights | Broader than glass alone: "safety equipment" |
| Colorado §10-4-613 | $0 glass endorsement | Same statute also bans steering to a specific shop |
| Connecticut §38a-339 | $0 on safety glass | Since 2005 insurers haven't had to tell you it exists |
| Minnesota §65B.134 | $0 on safety glass | Regularly mislabeled a "free windshield" state |
| Massachusetts c.175 §113O | $100 glass deductible | A floor, not $0. No MA law requires a zero option |
New York (§3411(k)) generally bans $0 deductibles on physical damage but lets insurers sell no-deductible window glass coverage. May sell. Not must offer. New York appears on "must offer" lists all over the internet; the state's own insurance regulator says otherwise.
Every other state has no deductible rule of its own, so the file-or-pay call is arithmetic. But the details around it, whether a claim can be surcharged and whether you can choose your own shop, still vary. The eight biggest are broken out just below.
These thirteen states waive nothing for glass, so your deductible decides the money. What varies is everything around it: whether a claim can raise your rate, whether you can pick your own shop, and whether a new shop-conduct law changes the paperwork. Verified against the primary statutes on the dates on each page.
| State | What actually matters there |
|---|---|
| Texas 28 TAC §5.7016 | One claim can't get you dropped, but three flying-object losses in 36 months let an insurer raise your deductible |
| California Ins. Code §1861.02 | A not-at-fault glass claim can't raise your driving-record rate, thanks to Prop 103 |
| Pennsylvania 31 Pa. Code §67.33 | A comprehensive claim can't be surcharged; the $0 "full glass" coverage is a paid add-on, not a state rule |
| Michigan MCL §500.2111 | The rate statute excludes comprehensive by name, so a glass claim can't be surcharged, and the anti-steering law names glass too |
| North Carolina N.C.G.S. §58-36-75 | Zero Safe Driver Incentive Plan points for a glass claim, but you can still lose a claims-free discount |
| Georgia O.C.G.A. §33-34-6 | Strong right-to-choose-your-shop law, but the not-at-fault surcharge shield covers only multivehicle crashes, not glass |
| Ohio R.C. §3937.31 | No state points and no mid-policy drop for a glass claim, but your renewal rate is the carrier's call |
| Illinois 215 ILCS 5/143.19 | No state points and no mid-policy cancellation for a glass claim; new rate-review authority arrives July 2027 |
| Virginia §59.1-207.6:3 | 2026 ADAS calibration disclosure law: shop must tell you in writing whether calibration is needed and whether they'll do it to spec |
| Louisiana HB 929 (2026) | NCOIL Motor Vehicle Glass Act: claim number before contract, ADAS disclosure, no kickbacks for referrals |
| Washington RCW 48.30.340 | Anti-steering, plus a written affiliation disclosure when the insurer owns the shop it recommends |
| Wisconsin §632.37 | Glass-specific anti-steering statute, separate from the general body-repair rule |
| Tennessee §§56-7-1113 to 56-7-1116 | Statute polices the shop: "free windshield" ads and deductible waivers by shops are unfair practices; assignment of benefits contemplated by name |
The remaining states without a distinctive rule share the same deductible-decides answer. For a Midwest pair we won't fake a distinction, see the honest Missouri and Indiana rollup. Everywhere else the arithmetic is what the calculator is for.
A recent wave of state laws (Iowa 2025, Utah 2021, Maryland 2023, New York 2025, plus 2026 bills in Virginia and Louisiana) regulates how glass shops handle ADAS calibration, assignments of benefits, and disclosures. These are shop-conduct laws. None of them waives a deductible or creates coverage, and articles citing them as new "free windshield" states are wrong. Disclosure is not coverage.
Every rule on these pages cites the primary statute with a link, carries the date we last verified it, and gets re-checked on a schedule (South Carolina is diarized for early 2027 because of its sunset bill). If you find a rule that's changed before we have, the statute wins, and we'd genuinely like to know.