Should I Claim It?

Windshield insurance laws by state: three regimes, not fifty rumors

Most "free windshield states" articles collapse three very different legal setups into one list, and several of the biggest ones haven't been updated in years. Here's the actual structure, verified against the primary statutes on August 13, 2026, with the statute linked on every page.

Written by Kent Lansing, Founder & EditorLast reviewed

Regime 1 · Deductible waived by law

Three states, and only three. Each with a different scope, which is where articles go wrong.

StateWhat's coveredThe catch
Florida
§627.7288
Windshield onlyNot side or rear glass. Whether calibration cost is included is legally unsettled
Kentucky
KRS 304.20-060
All glass, plus required lights, calibration included by statuteThe claim must be glass-only. Mixed storm damage voids the waiver
South Carolina
§38-77-280(B)
All safety glassPhysical-damage coverage is itself optional in SC. A 2026 sunset bill appears to have died; we re-check in 2027
Regime 2 · Insurer must offer the option

Five states where $0 (or reduced) glass coverage exists only if you added it to your policy. The question isn't "what does my state do," it's "what did I buy?"

StateThe optionWorth knowing
Arizona
§20-264
$0 on glass and required lightsBroader than glass alone: "safety equipment"
Colorado
§10-4-613
$0 glass endorsementSame statute also bans steering to a specific shop
Connecticut
§38a-339
$0 on safety glassSince 2005 insurers haven't had to tell you it exists
Minnesota
§65B.134
$0 on safety glassRegularly mislabeled a "free windshield" state
Massachusetts
c.175 §113O
$100 glass deductibleA floor, not $0. No MA law requires a zero option
Regime 3 · Optional coverage allowed, nothing required

New York (§3411(k)) generally bans $0 deductibles on physical damage but lets insurers sell no-deductible window glass coverage. May sell. Not must offer. New York appears on "must offer" lists all over the internet; the state's own insurance regulator says otherwise.

Every other state has no deductible rule of its own, so the file-or-pay call is arithmetic. But the details around it, whether a claim can be surcharged and whether you can choose your own shop, still vary. The eight biggest are broken out just below.

No deductible rule, but the fine print still differs

These thirteen states waive nothing for glass, so your deductible decides the money. What varies is everything around it: whether a claim can raise your rate, whether you can pick your own shop, and whether a new shop-conduct law changes the paperwork. Verified against the primary statutes on the dates on each page.

StateWhat actually matters there
Texas
28 TAC §5.7016
One claim can't get you dropped, but three flying-object losses in 36 months let an insurer raise your deductible
California
Ins. Code §1861.02
A not-at-fault glass claim can't raise your driving-record rate, thanks to Prop 103
Pennsylvania
31 Pa. Code §67.33
A comprehensive claim can't be surcharged; the $0 "full glass" coverage is a paid add-on, not a state rule
Michigan
MCL §500.2111
The rate statute excludes comprehensive by name, so a glass claim can't be surcharged, and the anti-steering law names glass too
North Carolina
N.C.G.S. §58-36-75
Zero Safe Driver Incentive Plan points for a glass claim, but you can still lose a claims-free discount
Georgia
O.C.G.A. §33-34-6
Strong right-to-choose-your-shop law, but the not-at-fault surcharge shield covers only multivehicle crashes, not glass
Ohio
R.C. §3937.31
No state points and no mid-policy drop for a glass claim, but your renewal rate is the carrier's call
Illinois
215 ILCS 5/143.19
No state points and no mid-policy cancellation for a glass claim; new rate-review authority arrives July 2027
Virginia
§59.1-207.6:3
2026 ADAS calibration disclosure law: shop must tell you in writing whether calibration is needed and whether they'll do it to spec
Louisiana
HB 929 (2026)
NCOIL Motor Vehicle Glass Act: claim number before contract, ADAS disclosure, no kickbacks for referrals
Washington
RCW 48.30.340
Anti-steering, plus a written affiliation disclosure when the insurer owns the shop it recommends
Wisconsin
§632.37
Glass-specific anti-steering statute, separate from the general body-repair rule
Tennessee
§§56-7-1113 to 56-7-1116
Statute polices the shop: "free windshield" ads and deductible waivers by shops are unfair practices; assignment of benefits contemplated by name

The remaining states without a distinctive rule share the same deductible-decides answer. For a Midwest pair we won't fake a distinction, see the honest Missouri and Indiana rollup. Everywhere else the arithmetic is what the calculator is for.

Laws that look like glass coverage but aren't

A recent wave of state laws (Iowa 2025, Utah 2021, Maryland 2023, New York 2025, plus 2026 bills in Virginia and Louisiana) regulates how glass shops handle ADAS calibration, assignments of benefits, and disclosures. These are shop-conduct laws. None of them waives a deductible or creates coverage, and articles citing them as new "free windshield" states are wrong. Disclosure is not coverage.

How we keep this honest

Every rule on these pages cites the primary statute with a link, carries the date we last verified it, and gets re-checked on a schedule (South Carolina is diarized for early 2027 because of its sunset bill). If you find a rule that's changed before we have, the statute wins, and we'd genuinely like to know.